The main outcome of the  dialogue that we do is a softening of attitude rather  than a change of opinion. Sometimes we do change  opinion in sessions. People might hear somebody  else's side of the story and actually say, you know what,  you might be right, I'm going to change my view.  It's very rare, though. I think the main point of  dialogue and the strongest thing that can come out  of it is that empathy. It's that understanding  the other side. But there's no  pressure to agree. You're not trying. This is the difference  between dialogue, debate. If you're having a debate,  you're trying to win over the other person, to win  over the audience who's watching the debate.  You're right. And the other person's argument  is wrong or is less valid or whatever. Dialogue is more about just  learning about the other and understanding without the  pressure of having to win the debate. And that's where it's a  completely different ballgame that you're playing,  because the outcome that you're trying to get  from that is to move on to another conversation  from that dialogue about how we can improve  the situation for the people involved, whether it's a personal situation or  the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Dialogue sets you up for that,  creates that empathy. And you can then start to be  more constructive and creative in your solutions  because you actually know what the other side need, you understand  where the other side is coming from. It's a tool and it's really important.